Utilization of Conflict Mapping to Identify Key Actors and their Relationship in the Maritime Disputes between Kenya and Somalia
Loading...
Date
2023-08
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
JAIS
Abstract
Conflict mapping has been useful in identifying important actors and their links in KenyaSomalia maritime disputes and clarifies the responsibilities and interests of multiple
stakeholders, including governments, organizations, and local communities, through
systematic classification and visual representation. This technique examines historical
associations, economic incentives, and political affiliations to understand interactions and
future alliances. Conflict mapping helps politicians, diplomats, and mediators navigate
complex situations through astute analysis and visual representation. Objectively, the study
analysed the key stakeholders involved in the maritime disputes between Kenya and Somalia,
evaluated the interactions, relationships, and dynamics between the key actors in maritime
disputes and utilized the insights gained from conflict mapping to inform decision-making
processes and contribute to conflict resolution efforts. The study employed a descriptive
research design, combining qualitative approaches such as interviews with diplomatic
officials, experts, and civil society representatives, with quantitative methods like social
network analysis. These approaches were designed to achieve the three objectives of the
study. The analysis of key stakeholders illuminated a diverse range of actors, including the
governments of Kenya and Somalia, international organizations, neighboring states, non-state
entities, and local communities, each driven by intricate interests and motivations. In
conclusion, Kenya-Somalia maritime issues involve many stakeholders with different
interests and concerns. The governments of both nations are key players because to
economic, strategic, and sovereignty factors. The UN and AU mediate and facilitate
diplomacy, while the ICJ provides legal foundation. Local communities and civil society
groups emphasize people. Historical, legal, geographical, and personal aspects affect
interactions and dynamics, making understanding crucial for effective remedies. Conflict
mapping insights help strategic decision-making by offering a holistic overview and
addressing political and human elements. Conflict mapping is essential for informed
strategies and durable peace as conflicts evolve. As a recommendation, Kenya and Somalia
should prioritize persistent, transparent diplomatic dialogue, respecting historical claims and
finding common ground. Facilitate neutral mediation through UN and AU engagement.
Address human impact with local community representatives. Trust and cooperation between
adjacent governments like Djibouti and Ethiopia can be used to evaluate interactions. Support
regional actors for stability with international organization support. Use conflict mapping to
improve decision-making. Visualize stakeholder interactions, strategically align coalitions,
and compromise. Ensure negotiating agendas address all stakeholders. Incorporate local
consultations. Accept inclusive conflict resolution guided by conflict mapping to address root
issues and improve regional stability.
Description
Article
Keywords
Citation
Kitavi, L. K & Nyawo, J. (2023). Utilization of Conflict Mapping to Identify Key Actors and their Relationship in the Maritime Disputes between Kenya and Somalia. Journal of African Interdisciplinary Studies, 7(8), 87 – 96.