Conflict Mapping and International Maritime Dispute Resolutions; Case of Kenya and Somalia (2014-2023)
Loading...
Date
2024-09
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Kenyatta University
Abstract
The primary objectives of this study were to examine the causes of the maritime disputes between Kenya and Somalia, utilize conflict mapping to identify key actors and their relationships, and assess the relevance of conflict mapping by analyzing the situation across Somalia's maritime border. Grounded in the theory of securitization, the research involved a comprehensive review of relevant literature, revealing significant gaps in the existing studies. A descriptive survey design was employed to collect detailed information about the conflict's historical context, key players, legal arguments, and potential resolutions. The target audience in Nairobi, Kenya, included representatives of embassies, government officials, international relations experts, maritime professionals, and civil society members. Stratified random sampling was used to select 160 survey respondents, ensuring representation from each stakeholder group. Additionally, key informant interviews were conducted with specific individuals to gather in-depth qualitative data. The primary data collection instruments were semi-structured interview guides and questionnaires, both of which were pretested to enhance their efficacy and clarity. To ensure the validity and reliability of the data collection methods, strict protocols were implemented. Quantitative data analysis involved descriptive and inferential statistics to identify patterns and relationships, while thematic analysis was used to uncover recurring themes and perspectives in the qualitative data. Ethical considerations, including informed consent, participant anonymity, and privacy, were rigorously maintained throughout the research process. The study's findings indicated that territorial claims, overlapping exclusive economic zones (EEZs), historical disagreements, geopolitical interests, security concerns, governance issues, and legal frameworks were the primary causes of the conflict. The research provided valuable insights to the governments of Kenya and Somalia, international entities such as the United Nations, regional organizations including the African Union and IGAD, mediators and facilitators, oil and gas companies, and local communities. Through conflict mapping, evidence-based strategies for resolving maritime disputes were suggested. The study recommends that policymakers, mediators, and stakeholders work towards a peaceful and just resolution of the conflict.
Description
A Research Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Award of the Degree of Master of Arts in International Relations and Diplomacy in the School of Law, Arts and Social Sciences of Kenyatta University, September 2024.
Supervisor
James Nyawo