Agronomic and Financial Benefits of Phosphate Rock Use in Acidic Soils of Upper Eastern Kenya

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorNdeleko-Barasa, Emily Mwake
dc.contributor.authorMucheru-Muna, Monicah
dc.contributor.authorNgetich, Felix Kipchirchir
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-05T12:45:19Z
dc.date.available2022-07-05T12:45:19Z
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.descriptionresearch paper in SSRNen_US
dc.description.abstractA major constraint to crop production in Sub-Saharan Africa is nutrient deficiency, especially phosphorus deficiency. Phosphorus plays a crucial role in photosynthesis but is usually deficient in acidic soils since it is converted to less available forms, affecting crop yields. There is a need to improve phosphorus availability to crops for maximum production. This study assessed the impact of phosphate rock fertilizer application on maize yields, soil chemical composition, and cost-effectiveness in Tharaka Nithi County, Upper Eastern Kenya. We set a field experiment in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) during long rains (SR2017) and Short rains (LR2018) seasons. The treatments were phosphate rock + manure, Tithonia diversifolia + phosphate rock, Calcium Ammonium Nitrate (CAN) + Triple Superphosphate (TSP), and a control. Soil samples were collected at a depth of 0-20 cm before and at the end of the experiment for pH, P-sorption, and other soil nutrients determinations. Other auxiliary data collected included labor and input costs besides output prices. The CAN+TSP treatment had significantly higher grain yields, while phosphate rock on its own had the second-lowest than the control treatment (p<0.05). We also observed a similar trend in the stover yields. Phosphate rock combined with either manure or Tithonia diversifolia led to a significant (p<0.05) increase in the phosphorous levels. Sole application of organics increased soil sodium and calcium while iron levels decreased. Other than the control, all treatments significantly lowered the p-sorption levels. However, CAN+TSP had the highest p-sorption while Tithonia diversifolia had the lowest. During the LR2018 season, a break-even point was arrived at with all the treatments, and the net benefit was significantly higher at P<0.05. Conclusively, the use of phosphate rock, either solely or in combination with organic elements, was found to improve yields, soil chemical composition, P-sorption, and very cost-effective.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNdeleko-Barasa, Emily Mwake and Mucheru-Muna, Monicah and Ngetich, Felix Kipchirchir, Agronomic and Financial Benefits of Phosphate Rock Use in Acidic Soils of Upper Eastern Kenya. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3882380 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3882380en_US
dc.identifier.otherdoi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.08.008
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/23851
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSSRNen_US
dc.subjectPhosphate Rocken_US
dc.subjectAgronomicen_US
dc.subjectcost-benefit analysisen_US
dc.subjectmaize yieldsen_US
dc.titleAgronomic and Financial Benefits of Phosphate Rock Use in Acidic Soils of Upper Eastern Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Agronomic and financial benefits of phosphate rock use in acidic soils of Upper Eastern.pdf
Size:
203.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Research article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
RP-Department of Environmental Education