RP-School of Security, Diplomacy and Peace Studies

Permanent URI for this community

https://repository.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/21001

Browse

Browsing RP-School of Security, Diplomacy and Peace Studies by Author "Kitavi, Linda Kana"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Utilization of Conflict Mapping to Identify Key Actors and their Relationship in the Maritime Disputes between Kenya and Somalia
    (JAIS, 2023-08) Kitavi, Linda Kana; Nyawo, James
    Conflict mapping has been useful in identifying important actors and their links in KenyaSomalia maritime disputes and clarifies the responsibilities and interests of multiple stakeholders, including governments, organizations, and local communities, through systematic classification and visual representation. This technique examines historical associations, economic incentives, and political affiliations to understand interactions and future alliances. Conflict mapping helps politicians, diplomats, and mediators navigate complex situations through astute analysis and visual representation. Objectively, the study analysed the key stakeholders involved in the maritime disputes between Kenya and Somalia, evaluated the interactions, relationships, and dynamics between the key actors in maritime disputes and utilized the insights gained from conflict mapping to inform decision-making processes and contribute to conflict resolution efforts. The study employed a descriptive research design, combining qualitative approaches such as interviews with diplomatic officials, experts, and civil society representatives, with quantitative methods like social network analysis. These approaches were designed to achieve the three objectives of the study. The analysis of key stakeholders illuminated a diverse range of actors, including the governments of Kenya and Somalia, international organizations, neighboring states, non-state entities, and local communities, each driven by intricate interests and motivations. In conclusion, Kenya-Somalia maritime issues involve many stakeholders with different interests and concerns. The governments of both nations are key players because to economic, strategic, and sovereignty factors. The UN and AU mediate and facilitate diplomacy, while the ICJ provides legal foundation. Local communities and civil society groups emphasize people. Historical, legal, geographical, and personal aspects affect interactions and dynamics, making understanding crucial for effective remedies. Conflict mapping insights help strategic decision-making by offering a holistic overview and addressing political and human elements. Conflict mapping is essential for informed strategies and durable peace as conflicts evolve. As a recommendation, Kenya and Somalia should prioritize persistent, transparent diplomatic dialogue, respecting historical claims and finding common ground. Facilitate neutral mediation through UN and AU engagement. Address human impact with local community representatives. Trust and cooperation between adjacent governments like Djibouti and Ethiopia can be used to evaluate interactions. Support regional actors for stability with international organization support. Use conflict mapping to improve decision-making. Visualize stakeholder interactions, strategically align coalitions, and compromise. Ensure negotiating agendas address all stakeholders. Incorporate local consultations. Accept inclusive conflict resolution guided by conflict mapping to address root issues and improve regional stability.