Contextual Limitations in Sandra Harding's Epistemological Framework and How They Can be Overcome
Loading...
Date
2024-05
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
EdinBurg Peer Reviewed Journals and Books Publishers
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the contextual constraints in Sandra Harding's epistemology and
suggest methods to get around them. The standpoint theory developed by Harding highlights
the significance of taking historical, social, and cultural contexts into account when producing
knowledge. This strategy essentializes and homogenizes various experiences and viewpoints.
The study offers potential solutions to these constraints by critically examining the drawbacks
of intersectionality and feminist standpoint theory. This entails embracing a more nuanced
understanding of power dynamics, encouraging inclusive and diverse viewpoints, and
acknowledging the complexities of multiple intersecting identities. The study aims to
strengthen and enhance Harding's epistemology by addressing its contextual limitations and
promoting a more equitable and inclusive approach to knowledge production. To achieve this
goal, this study employs the laws of thought: three guiding principles: the non-contradiction
rule, the excluded middle, and the identity principle. The study is primarily a conceptual
analysis that proceeded by library study, employing the typical philosophical argumentation
approach of evaluation, analysis, synthesis, reflection, and philosophical speculation. By
highlighting the weaknesses of Harding's epistemology and suggesting possible remedies, this
study contributes to a broader debate on the potential limitations of epistemology. It offers
insights into developing more robust epistemological frameworks that promote social justice
and inclusivity in knowledge inquiries, practices, and justification.
Description
Article
Keywords
Citation
Mulwa, B. J., Magero, J., & Oyigo, J. (2024). Contextual Limitations in Sandra Harding's Epistemological Framework and How They Can Be Overcome. Journal of Sociology, Psychology & Religious Studies