Contextual Limitations in Sandra Harding's Epistemological Framework and How they Can be Overcome

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMulwa, Beatrice Jannie
dc.contributor.authorMagero, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorOyigo, Josephat
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-14T09:11:50Z
dc.date.available2024-05-14T09:11:50Z
dc.date.issued2024-05
dc.descriptionArticleen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to investigate the contextual constraints in Sandra Harding's epistemology and suggest methods to get around them. The standpoint theory developed by Harding highlights the significance of taking historical, social, and cultural contexts into account when producing knowledge. This strategy essentializes and homogenizes various experiences and viewpoints. The study offers potential solutions to these constraints by critically examining the drawbacks of intersectionality and feminist standpoint theory. This entails embracing a more nuanced understanding of power dynamics, encouraging inclusive and diverse viewpoints, and acknowledging the complexities of multiple intersecting identities. The study aims to strengthen and enhance Harding's epistemology by addressing its contextual limitations and promoting a more equitable and inclusive approach to knowledge production. To achieve this goal, this study employs the laws of thought: three guiding principles: the non-contradiction rule, the excluded middle, and the identity principle. The study is primarily a conceptual analysis that proceeded by library study, employing the typical philosophical argumentation approach of evaluation, analysis, synthesis, reflection, and philosophical speculation. By highlighting the weaknesses of Harding's epistemology and suggesting possible remedies, this study contributes to a broader debate on the potential limitations of epistemology. It offers insights into developing more robust epistemological frameworks that promote social justice and inclusivity in knowledge inquiries, practices, and justification.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMulwa, B. J. ., Magero, J., & Oyigo, J. . (2024). Contextual Limitations in Sandra Harding’s Epistemological Framework and How They Can be Overcome. Journal of Sociology, Psychology and Religious, 4(2), 46–52. Retrieved from https://edinburgjournals.org/journals/index.php/journal-of-sociology/article/view/266en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://edinburgjournals.org/journals/index.php/journal-of-sociology/article/view/266
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/27872
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEdinBurgen_US
dc.subjectAndrocentrismen_US
dc.subjectHarding’s Epistemologyen_US
dc.subjectStandpointen_US
dc.subjectContextual Limitationen_US
dc.subjectEpistemologyen_US
dc.subjectEssentialismen_US
dc.subjectRelativismen_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.titleContextual Limitations in Sandra Harding's Epistemological Framework and How they Can be Overcomeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Contextual Limitations in Sandra Harding's Epistemological Framework and How they Can be Overcome.pdf
Size:
212.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full text Research Article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
RP-Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies