• English
    • français
  • English 
    • English
    • français
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Repository Home
  • Research Papers (RP)
  • RP-School of Applied Human Sciences
  • RP-Department of Foods, Nutrition & Dietetics
  • View Item
  •   Repository Home
  • Research Papers (RP)
  • RP-School of Applied Human Sciences
  • RP-Department of Foods, Nutrition & Dietetics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Effects of Processing Mucuna Bean (Mucuna pruriens L.) on Protein Quality and Antinutrients Content

Thumbnail
View/Open
Abstract (46.58Kb)
Date
2012-10-01
Author
Mugendi, Jane Beatrice
Njagi, E.N.M.
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Mucuna bean is grown in many parts of Kenya as a green manure/cover crop. The bean contains a high protein content but remains a minor food crop due to the presence of anti-nutrient compounds mainly 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine (L-Dopa). The potential for utilisation of mucuna bean as an alternative source of protein was evaluated by assessing the effect of various processing methods on its protein quality and anti-nutrient compounds. Mucuna bean was processed to remove L-Dopa and other anti-nutrient compounds by different methods such as soaking, autoclaving, roasting, germination, and alkaline fermentation. Protein quality was determined by amino acid composition, in vitro and in vivo rat balance methodologies. All processing techniques, except roasting, reduced levels of L-dopa by >95% and other anti-nutrient compounds such as total phenols, trypsin inhibitor and phytates. Processing improved in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD) but significantly (P < 0:05) reduced protein content. Soaking in acidic medium (pH 3.2) at 60°C for 48 hrs significantly improved IVPD (80.5 %) and biological value (80.8) of mucuna bean protein. The content of essential amino acids met the recommended FAO/WHO reference requirements for 2–5 yr old except for tryptophan. However, true digestibility for processed bean diet was poor (58 %) and protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) low (0.4) compared to that of reference casein (1.0). This was attributed to both low sulphur amino acids content and residual anti-nutrient factors that affect protein hydrolysis such as phenolic compounds. Mucuna protein diet did not support growth of weanling rats indicating amino acids pattern incompatible with the needs of weanling rats. Histological examination of liver and kidney tissues revealed that consumption of processed mucuna bean as the only source of protein caused inflammation of the organs. This suggests possible presence of other toxins in processed bean even though mucuna bean diet contained the recommended safe level of residual L-Dopa (<0.1%). Processing mucuna bean improved the protein quality and reduced the content of anti-nutrient compounds. However, mucuna bean is not recommended as a sole protein in human diet.
URI
http://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/5565
Collections
  • RP-Department of Foods, Nutrition & Dietetics [132]

Designed by Library ICT Team copyright © 2017 
Contact Us | Send Feedback

 

 

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Designed by Library ICT Team copyright © 2017 
Contact Us | Send Feedback