Low technology tissue culture materials for initiation and multiplication of banana plants
Loading...
Date
2010
Authors
Gitonga, Nkanata Mburugu
Ombori, O.
Muriithi, K.S.D.
Ngugi, M.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
African Journals Online
Abstract
Tissue culturing has become a routine method for propagating plants in high technology laboratories. The cost of
production using conventional tissue culture is, however, high for most of the countries in the sub-Saharan Africa. In
this study, we evaluated a micropropagating protocol for local banana (Musa spp.) (Muunju landrace) in Kenya as
an alternative to reduce the unit cost of tissue culture micropropagation. Matrices were satisfactory and comparable
to the gelling agents. Glass beads were, however, the best matrix in shoot multiplication. Use of support matrices,
locally available macronutrients, micronutrients, sugar, equipment and facility reduced the cost of consumable material
for banana tissue culturing by about 94%. Putting into account energy, labour and capital investments, the cost
dropped from approximately US $ 1.5 to 1.0 per plantlet. Contamination was not observed when the media and
equipment were sterilised using a pressure cooker instead of an autoclave. Use of plastic syringes instead of glass
cylinders and micropipettes, to measure volumes reduced the cost of the equipment by 96%. The risk of damage
and loss due to breakage was eliminated compared to the use of glassware equipment. Shoots were rooted when
they were transferred to Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 1 mg l-1 napthaleneacetic acid
(NAA) or 1 mg l-1 Anatone. Acclimatised plants were successfully transplanted and established in the field. There
is potential for use of locally available low cost resources as alternatives to the conventional costly laboratory
resources.
Description
Publisher version (African Journals Online) available at www.ajol.info/index.php/acsj/article/viewfile/68653/56732
Keywords
Autoclaves, gelling agents, glass beads
Citation
African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 243 - 251