Matiko, Bonfas MurimiMullu, Francis2025-10-132025-10-132025-03Matiko, B. M. & Mullu, F. (2025).Examining mining conflicts on community development in Eastern Equatoria State, South Sudan. Reviewed International Journal of Political Science & Public Administration, 6 (1), 69 –86.https://www.reviewedjournals.com/index.php/rijpspa/article/view/323/296https://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/31682ArticleThis study explored mining conflicts on c ommunity development in Eastern Equatoria State, South Sudan. The specific objectives of this study were to investigate the nature of mining conflicts in Eastern Equatoria State, South Sudan, to examine their consequences on community development in Easter n Equatoria State, South Sudan, and to identify potential strategies to mitigate these conflicts and promote sustainable development in mining - affected communities in Eastern Equatoria State. The study was guided by Resource Abundance Theory and Human Ecol ogy Theory (HET). A descriptive research design based on the quantitative and qualitative approach was adopted. Computer programs like the Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) were used to develop tables and figures, using frequency and percent age statistics. Both primary and secondary methods of data collection were employed. Purposive and snowball sampling were used to select respondents. Conflicts were prevalent, including resource exploitation (31.82%), violence (24.55%), and land disputes ( 10%), which severely hindered community development. Mining conflicts disrupted education (96.36%) and healthcare (96.36%), worsened unemployment (80%), and harmed social cohesion (85.5%). Environmental impacts, such as water pollution and deforestation, w ere reported by 87.3% of respondents. Key strategies to mitigate conflicts included increased government oversight (30%) and better compensation mechanisms (24.5%), with high community interest in participation (86.4%). The study concluded that mining conf licts in Eastern Equatoria negatively impact community development and social stability, with severe consequences for education, healthcare, and the environment. There is a significant gap in government intervention, leading to widespread dissatisfaction a nd a pressing need for improved regulation. Community - based and collaborative approaches with mining companies were viewed as essential to sustainable conflict resolution . The study recommended that government oversight should be strengthened to enforce mi ning regulations effectively. Mining companies should establish fair compensation mechanisms for affected communities to foster equitable resource sharing. Collaboration with local communities should be prioritized, including joint decision - making initiati ves to align operations with community needs. Finally, building local capacity in mining oversight and sustainable development practices is essential to empower communities and reduce long - term conflicts.enArticle