Improved Sample Selection and Preparation Methods for Sampling Plans Used to Facilitate Rapid and Reliable Estimation of Aflatoxin in Chicken Feed

View/ Open
Date
2021Author
Kibugu, James
Mdachi, Raymond
Munga, Leonard
Mburu, David
Whitaker, Thomas
Huynh, Thu P
Grace, Delia
Lindahl, Johanna F
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), a toxic fungal metabolite associated with human and animal diseases,
is a natural contaminant encountered in agricultural commodities, food and feed. Heterogeneity
of AFB1 makes risk estimation a challenge. To overcome this, novel sample selection, preparation
and extraction steps were designed for representative sampling of chicken feed. Accuracy, precision,
limits of detection and quantification, linearity, robustness and ruggedness were used as performance
criteria to validate this modification and Horwitz function for evaluating precision. A modified sampling protocol that ensured representativeness is documented, including sample selection, sampling
tools, random procedures, minimum size of field-collected aggregate samples (primary sampling),
procedures for mass reduction to 2 kg laboratory (secondary sampling), 25 g test portion (tertiary
sampling) and 1.3 g analytical samples (quaternary sampling). The improved coning and quartering
procedure described herein (for secondary and tertiary sampling) has acceptable precision, with a
Horwitz ratio (HorRat = 0.3) suitable for splitting of 25 g feed aliquots from laboratory samples (tertiary sampling). The water slurring innovation (quaternary sampling) increased aflatoxin extraction
efficiency to 95.1% through reduction of both bias (−4.95) and variability of recovery (1.2–1.4) and
improved both intra-laboratory precision (HorRat = 1.2–1.5) and within-laboratory reproducibility
(HorRat = 0.9–1.3). Optimal extraction conditions are documented. The improved procedure showed
satisfactory performance, good field applicability and reduced sample analysis turnaround time